TL;DR, or a brief overview of the campaign
| Campaign name |
|
| Client (grantor) |
|
| Duration |
|
| Goal |
|
| Assumptions |
|
| Results (as of March 2024) |
|
| Key activities |
|
Detailed campaign description
Context and challenge
Actions and effects
| Campaign phase | Key activities | Results & conclusions |
| INFORMATION (spring 2022 – autumn 2022) | getting to know the players involved – allies – a series of workshops and meetings to identify who has what resources, goals, and needs, and who our support could best help. public opinion research – clarifying the starting point (scale of knowledge and support for SCT and other green urban projects). information hub – building a website for media and officials with the most important reports, information, and data regarding SCT. media relations & paid collaborations with opinion leaders – launch of a coordinated information campaign on clean transport zones in traditional and social media (collaborations with, among others, Kasia Gandor, Tomasz Rożek). |
|
| CONSULTATIONS (winter 2022 – summer 2023) | PR support for Krakow, Warsaw, Wroclaw – creating information materials for residents about the planned clean transport zones (FAQs, detailed technical and substantive explanations, infographics, posters, animations) and materials for city councilors (so-called argument packs). public consultations – substantive and communication support for teams working on SCT in Warsaw and Wroclaw to ensure as many residents as possible learned about the consultations and took part in them. media monitoring and analysis – constant monitoring of media, social media, and the sentiment of the social debate around SCT, sharing analyses with cities and NGOs. animating support for SCT – encouraging those involved in social initiatives to participate in public consultations on SCT and to demand ambitious transport policies. |
|
| NARRATIVES (autumn 2023 – spring 2024) | soft actions for air – 1) anti-smog radio spot parodying a cough syrup advertisement, 2) "What does your street breathe" mini-campaign raising awareness of the health consequences of daily smog inhalation, 3) popularization of scientific research results regarding pollutant emissions (including from ICCT, ECAC, and doctors from the Polish Smog project), 4) podcast series with eco-educator Paulina Górska, featuring experts on green urban policies. facts and myths – communication and substantive support for people active in the debate around SCT in Warsaw and Krakow (including texts debunking the most common myths about SCT) to make the voice of supporters more audible. pre-election debates – for candidates to city councils in Warsaw and Wroclaw, and a presidential debate in Krakow. |
|
Conclusions and learnings

Wnioski, jakie wyciągamy po dwóch latach kampanii na rzecz stref czystego transportu:
- Clean-air organizations enjoy relatively high social (and media) trust in Poland, but they often lack the resources to run large campaigns themselves. Combining the forces and reaches of several different organizations and activist groups yields good results.
- Local governments often lack the time and resources to conduct effective communication with residents. Many cities are open to using external substantive and expert support, provided they trust the social partners.
- Support for green changes in Polish cities reaches 50-70% depending on the proposed solution, but a significant part of the supporting group is the so-called silent majority. Meanwhile, opposition to pro-ecological policy turns out to be good “fuel” for some political forces to build a loud narrative, often utilizing hate and disinformation. To ensure that progressive changes are not halted, the voices of social movements and residents themselves – and not just experts – who support the change must also be heard in the debate around clean transport zones (and related topics).
- The media and public opinion are generally less interested in reports and social campaigns, and more in specific government decisions that affect the daily lives of residents. Every such “event” (like the start of public consultations or a debate at a city council session) ignites a wave of discussion. It is good to have information materials prepared in advance, written in simple language, including those that address common human fears and debunk emerging myths.
- Media messaging is governed by viewership and click-through rates. Therefore, it is important to create objective information resources regarding planned changes on official municipal and government websites.
- False perceptions (both negative and positive) can easily arise regarding unprecedented changes, which are difficult to verify because they concern the future. The fact that similar solutions operate in other countries and we know their effects is not an argument for many people. A factual debate then turns into a conflict of values.
- Even a “technical” issue such as conditioning the right to enter a zone based on car emission standards can have a significant socio-cultural context. It is worth thoroughly researching this and keeping it in mind, both when planning solutions and communicating them. The fears and emotions of people who may actually lose out due to the change in regulations cannot be ignored. But first, this group of residents must be well-diagnosed. The next phase of the campaign will therefore focus on better mapping their fears and frustrations and refining clear and honest messages that address these concerns.
Grzegorz Dzięgielewski
Zuzanna Szybisty
Sophie Peck



